Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Astronomy@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agoNASA's 46-year-old Voyager 1 probe is no longer transmitting datawww.livescience.comexternal-linkmessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up149arrow-down119
arrow-up130arrow-down1external-linkNASA's 46-year-old Voyager 1 probe is no longer transmitting datawww.livescience.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Astronomy@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square13linkfedilink
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🌀 🇳 🇦 🇸 🇰 🇦 🇵 🇮@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-22 years agoTitle is “no longer transmitting data.” If it’s repeating a pattern, then data is no longer being transmitted.
minus-squaresnooggums@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down8·2 years agoUnreadable data is still data.
minus-squareivanafterall@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoIt is made of lots of little bytes of mayonnaise.
minus-squaremetaStatic@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 years agoI’m a fan of the many jars interpretation
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·2 years agoIt’s not unreadable. It’s not data. If you want to be pedantic you could say it’s “transmitting symbols”. If I only typed out “abaababababbaab” over and over you wouldn’t call it “unreadable words.” You’d say it’s not words.
minus-squaresnooggums@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 years agoOmg, you can’t just type “abaababababbaab” on the internet you filthy animal!
Title is “no longer transmitting data.” If it’s repeating a pattern, then data is no longer being transmitted.
Unreadable data is still data.
Is mayonnaise data?
It is made of lots of little bytes of mayonnaise.
Quantum mayonnaise theory.
I’m a fan of the many jars interpretation
Yes.
It’s not unreadable. It’s not data.
If you want to be pedantic you could say it’s “transmitting symbols”.
If I only typed out “abaababababbaab” over and over you wouldn’t call it “unreadable words.” You’d say it’s not words.
Omg, you can’t just type “abaababababbaab” on the internet you filthy animal!