I’ve got repacked games to work just fine.
wholookshere
- 0 Posts
- 15 Comments
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zoneto
Linux@lemmy.ml•LTT does another Linux ChallengeEnglish
35·1 month agonot them, but no, its you.
your the one bitching people use Linux differently than you
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.ml•"No right to relicense this project" - on changing the license of Mark Pilgrim's chardet from LGPL to MIT after a vibe-coded rewriteEnglish
41·2 months agookay, repeating an unverified claim is better?
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.ml•"No right to relicense this project" - on changing the license of Mark Pilgrim's chardet from LGPL to MIT after a vibe-coded rewriteEnglish
5·2 months agoYou claim
https://vger.to/lemmy.ml/comment/24346212
That its completlt rewritten, with the implication that its not using the project as input.
So yes, you do should back that up
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.ml•"No right to relicense this project" - on changing the license of Mark Pilgrim's chardet from LGPL to MIT after a vibe-coded rewriteEnglish
121·2 months agoThat’s valid in a debate, but not quite how courts work?
I’m not a lawyer, just someone petty enough to read laws.
The discovery requests in the law suit will require yo turn over all training data. From there, it will be up to the AI makers to prove that it wasn’t used, if it was fed into training data. Which if it was open source, almost certainly was.
That as side.
Your making an equal claim that it wasn’t. With an equal amount of proof. So what your sating bears as much weight as the other person.
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.ml•"No right to relicense this project" - on changing the license of Mark Pilgrim's chardet from LGPL to MIT after a vibe-coded rewriteEnglish
122·2 months agookay, you have to be able to prove the LLM didn’t learn off of the original source material. Because if it is, its dertivitve work, making it subject to LGPL.
No, OP is a troll.
but it still restarts at all.
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zoneto
Self-hosting@slrpnk.net•Question for those of you using Matrix/CommetEnglish
3·2 months agoSo sponsoring a feature might be possible. Its referred to as a bounty. Posting it with your request is the way to go. Especially if they have donors on their page.
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zoneto
Self-hosting@slrpnk.net•Question for those of you using Matrix/CommetEnglish
2·2 months agoIt doesnt come from a place of not listening to real users.
Most open source projects are hobbies. Tools that they want to use themselves, so thats who they build for. Themselves.
We just get to come for the ride and use what they built for free.
That’s why you see this a lot.
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zoneto
Self-hosting@slrpnk.net•Question for those of you using Matrix/CommetEnglish
3·2 months agoWhat are you looking for?
it’s unlikely they have that feature, and short of someone volunteering to code it for you, unlikely anyone here will be able to help.
I’d recomend looking at the project and opening a feature request
there’s a lot more to the article than open source
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.ml•The Case for Blogging in the RuinsEnglish
3·4 months agobecause writing is a good skill to have professionally.
also, you have the itch, so why care if people read?
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.ml•The Case for Blogging in the RuinsEnglish
3·4 months agodo it for you then!

No he’s not shoving ID verification.
He added an optional birth date field to the user database. Along side things like name and location.
Nothing checks the date entered, and nothing enforces it’s use.