Venia Silente

Agree! I hereby propose that Google forwards US$1000 to the developers each time the AI signals a bug. Don’t even need to write it off as expense, it’s just “investment on QA”.

ffmpeg devs can refuse the AI generated bugfixes for all we care. What I’m heading at is if Google is going to spend AI on posting a problem, then they should also post the solution. At their own expense.

if Google has the resources to put AI to slop bug reports, then it also has the resources to put AI to also post the fixes. So, they should get going. No one owes Google of all corporations free labour.

Installed from the internet, it’s downloaded. Installed from a local source (storage, adb) it’s sideloaded installed.

Fixed that for you. Why would the local, direct installation method be the “side” one? Have you become that terminally online?

Consider the following:

On the one hand. Slavery got repurposed and repackaged in a nice 9-to-5 format - 8 hours, so that we’d stop complaining. Compared to that, spending let’s say two hours on videogames is defo not bad.

On the other hand, we’re talking about Roblox, one of the largest brainrots around. There’s defo better stuff to engage in.

Hexchat dead? I just checked on Sid and it’s available. Heck, I forgot I had it installed.

project for emulator of a Nintendo console

Github

Where’s the emotion of the hunt in that!!!

Trump has already shown that greenness of cards means nothing to him, so it’s not like these people would be losing any immigration safe ground by not suing.

Needing a full JS engine to run on your user account for Youtube? What are the privacy and security implications here?

Oh yeah also you have to use the terminal for practically everything (even audio control in calls).

pfff easy, M-a C-x C-volumedown. Good ol’ Emacs.

Same place as Facebook: already in the pockets.

Oh that one is easy: most stuff is in the browser nowadays.

So… Linux phone when, then?

In my experience at least, the two primary benefits (and sometimes, the only benefits) of re-encoding are 1.- reduced file size and 2.- increased device compatibility.

The file size is relevant because you can fit more stuff for essentially the same quality: reencoding a FLAC album to ~160k Opus uses up only 1/5th to 1/4th of the space, ~196k Opus is 1/4th to 1/3rd of the space, so it can be a pretty good gain on aggregate. A movie in 4K is worth nearly 6 movies in 1080p and nearly 9 movies in 720p, and for ~95% of extant content in the world rebasing down from 4K to at least 1080p presents no practical loss.

The compatibility is usually only relevant when you want to have that content be easily accessible in eg.: a remote media server, a streaming system, or one of those gool ol’reliable MP3 thumbsticks. In those cases, you’d be reencoding audio from FLAC to MP3 to increase device compatibility (and getting some decent space savings too). If your Jellyfin server’s connection is over wifi or you’ll access the data outside of your local network, re-encoding to lower sizes means transmission requires less bandwidth, as well as other savings (incl.: energy consumption in aggregate).

Aren’t private trackers just toby clubs for dick measuring upload speeds?

Now now, how can you possibly experience the satisfaction of having cleansed yourself of cringe after-the-fact from watching paint dry?

This pretty much. I’ve never understood the point of something like The_Avengers.[4K][8K][16][Dolby_7.18_3D][128subs].mkv… what, do people want to take note of The Hulk’s groin warts?

For stuff like animation content, even 720p is too much unless it’s content from the last ~5 years. Anything before Infinity Train does pretty well on 540p or 480p with 96k audio, and if I’m looking for a movie from the 80s, let alone a black-and-white from the 50s, I’m certainly not interested in a 8K rip that would naturally have to be an AI upscale.

Maybe for Americans storage falls from trees, could you share what is this normal supermarket where I can buy 100tb of total space?