

Because fighting against disinformation has always been about fighting for the control of the narrative
Big up to all the bots in the comments.
«hallowed be thy Name, thy Kingdom come», that’s ‘the christians Aim’/Islam
We(sterners), aggressors, are still the main(~only) obstacle to ‘world peace’/‘a union of diversities’
♪All we are saaying…♬(, are we even trying ? we could/should protect them&us)


Because fighting against disinformation has always been about fighting for the control of the narrative
Big up to all the bots in the comments.


Thanks for the explanation, but since you, along with mathematics, agree that there’s a surface, there should be a normal/perpendicular, and you can get more or less close to that surface, i guess i just can’t wrap my head around it, it’d mean that the hypersphere is on both sides of its surface ?
I’ve read elsewhere that the universe would be this (hyper)surface, i wonder what the surface of a 5d-sphere would look like then.


Yep, just read some stuff on Quora about 4D spheres, and still don’t get it 🤷♂️
You have an edge on the Earth, both above and below, i can’t imagine the material part of the All circling upon itself, how would you visualise from outside ?
I still see an edge with an hypersphere, well, w/e, thanks for the answer anyway :) !


Although “commonly accepted” may be pushing it, i can’t imagine a finite universe(, i.e., ‘with a positive curvature’/spherical), with the old question : what happens at the edge if i push it with a stick ?
(I.i.r.c., the answer is that the edge is expanding faster than the speed of light or sthg)
(And, kinda unrelated, fractal universes piling upon each other may make sense)


Have a look at lemmit.online, it copies reddit’s content through a bot and deserves to be more known.


That’s the only thing worrying me, yes, but since lemmit did it… i.d.k. Thanks for the comment !
The title isn’t exact :


Moreover, their relations were only re-instaured after the western-supported coup by J.Añez :

(Here’s Colombia’s president 6 hours ago b.t.w., among other examples)

(no need to point out that it would be safer for them not to take position for//against any side. The article also spoke of Argentina, here’s an interesting 2mn-long point of view)