Car engines are immensely inefficient and car charging is a load that’s easy to load-balance for renewables (dynamic pricing see: Tesla)

And it was created because Ukrainian nationalists were acting up.

China’s EV revolution showcases the power that state actors have when an industry is a matter of national security.

China has marginal domestic O&G reserves, so moving off of O&G is incredibly important for Chinese interests.

Israel gets to experience a tiny bit of what Gaza experiences every day.

Ukraine had identity even as a member of the USSR. That’s why they were the Ukrainkan Soviet Socialist Republic and not the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic. Russian leadership is calling for the end of Ukrainian nationalism as an element of Ukrainian identity. Pick up a Russian language dictionary, maybe?

War is often a political issue, not an existential one. Ukrainians will not suddenly drop dead because the Ukrainian state dissolves.

Makes sense, since China isn’t as reliant on USD for trade between ASEAN and Russia (and soon, I expect, the Middle East/South America/Africa). China doesn’t need those deep foreign reserves if they’re not going to be using them.

There’s not much the Pope can do tbh

Even though the IDF has been bombing churches, the Pope is powerless

I don’t think the US has enough political power in the Middle East anymore…

As far as I can tell they just translated a Defence Arabia article and cross-referenced it with publicly available information on US deliveries to Ukraine. In another comment, I cited the original article (in Arabic) that they appear to draw from.

Original source seems to be from Defense Arabia in Arabic: https://defensearabia.com/2023/11/المغرب-يحصل-على-دبابات-أبرامز-وينقل/

[Morocco purchased an] additional 162 M1A2 SEP v.3 Abrams tanks in 2018 for an estimated cost of $1.259 billion

Original source seems to be Arabic: https://defensearabia.com/2023/11/المغرب-يحصل-على-دبابات-أبرامز-وينقل/

Good. Let the fat cats fall.

I think focusing on the entire meat industry is counterproductive. Meat forms the foundation of a lot of cultures (in terms of cuisine, if nothing else). However, not all meat is created equal. Beef, for example, is notoriously bad for the environment and uses an astonishing amount of land. Replacing beef with chicken, fish, or even pork or lamb would do wonders for the emissions footprint of the agriculture industry.

Everything about the author is what’s posted on the website. There’s no evidence to back it up: no record of graduation, no evidence of a degree. Dude could say anything and there would be no way to validate it.

That’s not true for institutions or news agencies, where the journalists have very public records.

What credentials does this “Dave Van Zandt” have. What evidence is there that support his credibility?

Scientific studies use it because it’s a dataset. Do you want me to point you to the hundreds of shitty datasets that people have used in the past for machine learning work?

Media Bias Fact Check is less reputable than pretty much every site they report on.

They have no credentials to establish their credibility. Seriously, try to find any anything about the people running the site.