Guess i’m going back to no internet, then, probably for the best.
- 0 Posts
- 22 Comments
It’s like it’s both space and time.
They will simply cut whatever protections exist stopping it. Still do it, just don’t expect it to be a forever solution.
With reasoning like that, I guess nothing is ever a conspiracy to people like you.
History very clearly shows the myriad ways the powerful enact ‘conspiracy theory’ agendas, regularly. To not include these learnings in your worldview is folly. Epstein is a giant ‘conspiracy theory’ that’s sitting out in the open. The inaction to do anything about it is another one.
It’s to disempower you. All of this is to further disempower the masses.
minorkeys@sh.itjust.worksto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Can't prove environmental issues if you don't have the dataEnglish
13·11 days ago“Trump has further eroded America’s ability to know reality in order to create more favourable conditions for his strategy of constantly lying.”
minorkeys@sh.itjust.worksto
Games@sh.itjust.works•Gabe Newell reportedly snapped 'What the f*** do I pay you for if that's your opinion?' at Valve lawyer pushing for more content moderation on SteamEnglish
62·12 days agoBecause it is. It’s social engineering.
minorkeys@sh.itjust.worksto
Risa: Your Home Away from Spacedock@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Canon enough for me
12·19 days agoDoesn’t matter, they prefer making up stories.
Welcome to the dependency economy where you can’t afford to not let them fuck you.
minorkeys@sh.itjust.worksto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•insert mental health condition hereEnglish
33·1 month agoYep. Their moral arrogance makes them socially aggressive, especially in the face of uncomfortable, practical realities. They refuse to acknowledge that they are the modern day version of the very morality policing they vilify from previous generations. They don’t see it because they don’t hold the same values or beleifs that the past generations did, and it is the beliefs and values they disagreed with, not the system.
I look at them and see the a similarly oppressive, prejudice, abusive social control system. They see that the beleifs and values are different. It was never that the whole system was wrong, it was that the system didn’t support their beleifs and values. Now that it does, and they control it, they’re content to engage in similar oppression and prejudice of the groups they dislike.
It has always been about control, in service to self interest. It was not about building a better, more just and fair society. It’s part of why the left and right are so far apart today and how Trump is in the white house, again, abusing the power of the executive almost exclusively for personal gain.
minorkeys@sh.itjust.worksto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•insert mental health condition hereEnglish
53·1 month agoYah, urban liberals can be exceptionally closed minded, in their own unique way.
minorkeys@sh.itjust.worksto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•insert mental health condition hereEnglish
5·1 month agoTo further that point, it’s guaranteed that what was normal, isn’t, anymore. Some things are, much isn’t. For example, few men, relatively, know how to hunt anymore or would be willing or able to kill an animal. Becoming able to do that has wide ranging impacts on who they are. This used to be normal. If we accept that the environment shapes us then when it changes, so do we, and with that, what is considered normal, shifts.
Respect the self control.
There are plenty of missing children, of all kinds of ages that went missing at all kind of times. So yes, they could have been. What was known of the situation more than justified taking some kind of action on behalf of the children, incase they were not hers.
One incident does not prove another.
minorkeys@sh.itjust.worksto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•insert mental health condition hereEnglish
312·1 month agoWe can’t know whether the prevalence rates have changed or by how much and its foolish to assume it’s only because of better awareness. The world we exist in has changed immensely and we are subject to the affects of those environmental changes.
If the state has good reason to believe someone had abducted children, I would want them to intervene, would you not?
Nobody knows the limit of their tools until those limits are known. Where did you decide they thought they were infallible? They followed the law they have, as is their job. Justice is not perfect, we don’t have all the answers, jumping to such vicious conclusions speaks more about you than them. The entire incident, and her successful appeal after further investigation, was like a year. Nobody threw the woman into prison for a decade or something. Seriously, people are so reactionary.


No but the camera network with constant facial and object recognition will probably track it all anyways.