

I noticed that my colleagues that didn’t turn webcams on were all women, so I started turning mine off for anything I thought they might attend.


I noticed that my colleagues that didn’t turn webcams on were all women, so I started turning mine off for anything I thought they might attend.
No, it’s already wrong even for realistic staggered dinners.
I think they are using an arbitrary GW-day of energy instead of power, so it can’t even come close to making as much turkey as claimed.
Or how 1 GW/(200 W/person) came up with a number that started with a 3 instead of a 5. Like 5 million people, not 30 million.
You’re not going to believe this but Ball made all of the mirror … except the mirror itself.


I don’t think HIPPA applies in Jerusalem.


It’s not a literature review. It’s a case report on a specific patient. It’s impossible to imagine writing a discussion of your own patient in this way, or to accept an approximately 5 page article without reading it.
The journal Radiology Case Reports is refereed by an editorial board led by University of Washington professors, associate professors, and doctors of medicine.
Radiology Case Reports is an open-access journal publishing exclusively case reports that feature diagnostic imaging. Categories in which case reports can be placed include the musculoskeletal system, spine, central nervous system, head and neck, cardiovascular, chest, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, multisystem, pediatric, emergency, women’s imaging, oncologic, normal variants, medical devices, foreign bodies, interventional radiology, nuclear medicine, molecular imaging, ultrasonography, imaging artifacts, forensic, anthropological, and medical-legal. Articles must be well-documented and include a review of the appropriate literature.
$550 - Article publishing charge for open access
10 days - Time to first decision
18 days - Review time
19 days - Submission to acceptance
80% - Acceptance rate
No. If you put them in order one after another you are not talking about the real numbers. There is no “next” real number and no possible way to visit them all one at a time like with the rationals.
No. In any interval of the real numbers there’s an uncountable infinity of real numbers. No matter how much you stretch the track any neighborhood, no matter how small, will need an infinite number of people in it.
Only the real cardinallity must. The integer cardinallity could have them spaced out enough that they won’t collapse.
For you to do this trolley problem you’d need to be outside the real track black hole so the question becomes: do you let a trolley go into a black hole or do you switch it to an infinite track that kills an infinite number of people?
Edit: in which case the black hole must be infinitely far away and you don’t even know about it. So: do you pull the switch to cause a trolley to start killing a seemingly infinite number of people? Which based on the other replies in this thread the answer is a resounding “yes”


EIH is probably Everyone’s Illogical Here
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I’ve got a couple Beitong Asura 2 Pros with hall effect sensors, and they work great, and haven’t worn out like xbox controllers and dualshock 4s do.
I use them with USB-C cables instead of the wireless dongle or bluetooth because they just work forever that way.
The buttons are reprogrammable; I make back buttons on everything I can into the thumbstick buttons so I never have to depress the thumbsticks. It also has a d-pad/thumbstick switch mode if you want to use d-pad on games that use thumbstick.
They have a nintendo mode, but I’ve never tried it.