Ok, I just searched their codeberg for the word “fuck” and both (yes, exactly 2) closed MRs were, in fact, heaps of LLM puke with no engagement from the “author”. More importantly, both of these were created after the policy was posted.
I think your argument is nonsense. Post evidence if you have it, but I’m guessing you won’t.
Why are you so sure this is “revisionism”? They’re not trying to rewrite history, they’re trying to explain their staunch policy.
It’s their project, and if they want to carefully select contributors they think will stick around and be a member of the community, then that is entirely their prerogative. This is a viable model for a niche project. There’s no requirement that they invest time and energy to review and integrate every last PR.
We could look at historical values and predictions, but I actually love the “is it enough” question from a philosophical or first principles perspective.
People who develop and maintain closed-source software. Who did you think you were referring to?
Uh, most of us are selling our labor the same as anyone else, dude.
I am not sure open source can reproduce the “LinkedIn experience”. I’m also not sure that’s a huge loss. That place is a dumpster fire on a steep hill.
At least pushing it is free :)
I assume you mean radio frequencies, and the answer is basically none. A grounded fireproof safe is basically a perfect faraday cage.
EDIT: Ok, I actually have a pedantic answer for this. If you put a microphone on a device inside the safe, you can signal it from outside by sending it vibrations, and you could encode a message in binary and thus technically send it a “digital signal”. If you wanted to be a little more analog you could use Morse code :)
Probably yeah. A fireproof safe will be airtight, so the system can only produce as much energy as whatever reagents you put inside.
As a reasonable compromise, why not just enforce the quiet time outside of business hours? I hear all sorts of loud shit outside my window but as long as it doesn’t wake me up, I shrug it off as the price of living in the city.
I think that the code of conduct pre-diff is less professional but totally unambiguous about AI-generated contributions, so I’m not sure where your confusion is coming from. And I have already spent more time looking for evidence of your claims than you have, so no thanks, I think that unless you present something of substance I’m good.