I can’t say I read the whole thing because the technical analysis went over my head, but I don’t think we read the same conclusion

Conclusions

Based on the analysis of packet captures above, I believe it is clear that anyone who has sufficient visibility into Telegram’s traffic would be able to identify and track traffic of specific user devices. Including when perfect forward secrecy protocol feature is in use.

This would also allow, through some additional analysis based on timing and packet sizes, to potentially identify who is communicating with whom using Telegram.

“Made up of” -> the non profit consists of software that must be free and open source…?

If she’s arguing for … crap then she should probably stick to Science.

tldr/w: I probably should’ve only doe this bit here and on her being a physicist versus a science communicator

Humorously enough, she also has a video for that Basically she talks about:

• Why “doing your own research” should be poked at

* Topics she doesn’t have a PhD in and has been told she shouldn’t talk about

* On being a physicist versus a science communicator

• Main video points
  1. When not to do your own research (When there isn’t enough research) 2.(?) Reasonable expectations (Why she doesn’t talk about UFO’s, a plug for support to do a video on ‘Experts’, limits of Google/internet, what is relevant for understanding? )
  2. Be honest with yourself (Acknowledge what you dont understand, erroneous mental short cut example)

4. Acknowledge biases

Rest of video not as relevant to your point

Do your own research. But do it right. [Video] Now where’s that bot at…?