that’s eight years ago

Just imagine the potential for a govt/EU to revoke your oficial / legal identity at any time :)

A government doesn’t need to take away your papers to deny you its services.

“non-Afroeurasian” - so American and Autralian? (Or Ameritralian? Australican?)

Waterfox

*only applies if your mother or grandmother happens to have made cooking / improving their cooking skills their hobby

I disagree. Even unfinished or abandoned projects can be helpful to others.

Just mark it as “WIP”, “unfinished” or “abandoned” (depending on whether you consoder coming back to it), but let the code still be available.

If someone (like you) searches for actively maintained, fully-featured projects, they can dismiss your project the moment they see that term.

Eternity sometimes replaces a post’s thumbnail with that of a post further down the list.

Are there any performance benchmarks for the Star64?

Pine64 claims the chip to have performance similar to certain Cortex-A55 processors, which would put the Star64 on par with the Raspberry 4 series. Is that true?

For something like a gamepass it’s debatable.

You probably pay more if using a gamepass, but you also try a lot more games.

If you played as many games without a gamepass as with one, you’d pay a lot more.

But without a gamepass, you usually restrict yourself to fewer games.

Whether removing such restriction is worth the (not as significant) additional cost is subjective.

So there’s an actual case for subscription in cases like this.

(The reason subscriptions make some sense here is because digital items are artificially limited. With physical items or services subscriptions are almost always a money grab. But with artificially limited things, such as digital items, subscriptions can definitely be reasonable.)

Television and magazines are far more general. Television as a medium could be compared to Web as a medium. YT could be compared to a specific TV channel.

Now I wonder what makes someone look like they watch Star Trek

app is closed source :/

Looks cool though

in many cases when people bring up boy’s or men’s issues they will only do so while simultaneously attacking feminist talking points.

This is very much a talking point by “only girls can have issues” people.

“Men don’t have issues, men’s rights groups only exist to spread misogyny!”

That is a key point of why the idea that men’s issues are not taken seriously is spreading, because simply talking about / focusing on men’s issues quickly gets people labled as misogynists.

This both gets people to stop caring about the idea of misogynism, because “apparently simply talking about men’s issues is misogyny”, and thereby also pushes people to develop more problematic views.