

the only truth to the headline is the increasingly part - and it’s because of articles like this.


the only truth to the headline is the increasingly part - and it’s because of articles like this.

that’s uhhh…my point? sort of. the constitution requires no ID. and in general no federal, state, county, or municipal authority provides ID. which makes any requirements unconstitutional.


i’m sorry but i have to be pedantic here. it’s not how you get your revenue it’s the good or service you provide.
magazines are not ad companies. TV channels are not ad companies. the source of your revenue does not make you a company in a sector of that source.


wait was it nesisary or nesusary.
nesesary? nesasary? nesysary?


“hi lae’zel we just met --”
“i want your moisture”
ohhhhkay


If you wait until someone is about to die
yeah, if you push someone out of the way of a vehicle, you could say (accurately) that they were about to die but now they’re right as rain. but when someone is about to die because of an ever increasingly worsening medical scenario that unfolded predictably (that’s a big part of it - the medical knowledge we possess being able to prevent the condition)… it’s not like being on death’s door will suddenly mean you’re back to normal without great effort, cost, suffering, and risk.
imagine applying that to any other medical condition “yeah your head hurts / it’s difficult to breathe / your toe is green / etc, but you aren’t about to die yet. come back when you’re brought in an ambulance”


not disagreeing with your first paragraph, but sort of adding that it’s not a desire to control women’s bodies - it’s a desire to control everything. the society they want requires a “traditional nuclear family” run by a patriarch. a woman’s body is one part of this and is the means not the end.
i am disagreeing with your second paragraph as it was the ghoul in the senate who placed 3 fascists on the supreme court.
biblically accurate samsung galaxy s24