Well, the plants are.

I think just similar names.

In Austria Maier is very common, but also Meier, or Mayer.

Thank you for the explanation.

Thank you for the explanation.

How does having a moon and the tilted axis contribute to evolution?

You are a bit late to that, because the last one was 1987.

Edit: was meant as a comment to the other comment, my bad.

Only?

I dislike the mowing robots because they seem to encourage the Flatt grass only gardens and I hate them.

You can still have flowers around them yes, but the grass is mostly a plant and insect desert.

It can be free, but people creating a distro can ask for money. Mostly it’s free tho, and you probably can enter a custom amount of 0.

“Even more news” general news and politics

“Trash taste” anime and japanese centric by 3 people who moved to Japan and are YouTubers

Its a bit frustrating, as I didnt see any answer and couldnt clarify.

Yeah, that was the intention. but I guess it didnt fly.

What a bad fix.

I know one.

I see that the context is a different one and i also understand formal logic (contrary to what the other comment on my post says)

It’s just that if the topic is pi, I find it potentially confusing (and not necessary) to construct a different example which is based on pi (pi in binary and interpreted as base 10) in order to show something, because one might associate this with the original statement.

While this is faulty logic to do so, why not just use an example which doesn’t use pi at all in order to eliminate any potential.

I did realize now that part of my post could be Interpreted in a way, that I did follow this faulty logic -> I didn’t

Is the 1.0010101 just another sequence with similar properties? And this sequence with similar properties just behaves differently than pi.

Others mentioned a zoo and a penguin. If you say that a zoo will contain a penguin, and then take one that doesn’t, then obviously it will not contain a penguin. If you take a sequence that only consists of 0 and 1 and it doesn’t contain a 2, then it obviously won’t.

But I find the example confusing to take pi, transform it and then say “yeah, this transformed pi doesn’t have it anymore, so obviously pi doesn’t” If I take all the 2s out of pi, then it will obviously not contain any 2 anymore, but it will also not be really be pi anymore, but just another sequence of infinite length and non repeating.

So, while it is true that the two properties do not necessarily lead to this behavior. The example of transforming pi to something is more confusing than helping.