• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2025

help-circle



  • What compromise are you doing with GrapheneOS+Google services that you aren’t making with microG? In my experience the sandboxed version of Play Services works much better than MicroG, with the added security of using an android native service developed by Google themselves.

    You can argue “MicroG isn’t Google” but it actually is since it’s just a bunch of Google libraries with some FOSS costing on top. And again, you’re more likely to get your phone remotely hacked by a silly exploit that was patched months ago but still got you because instead of GrapheneOS you decided to use some other security-void like Calyx, LineageOS or /e/OS.


  • What a weak line of argumentation. Hopes and dreams don’t matter on the face of reality.

    There is a reason why investigative journalists, activists and whistleblowers use GrapheneOS, and it is the only OS that is recommended for such use cases. It’s the only OS that has the receipts to prove their are resistant to remote penetration breaches from the likes of Pegasus and common evil maidens like Celebrite.

    There are no high-risk personas using microG OSes. The ones who did are now dead.

    You’re free to use your insecure and outdated OS of choice that allows you to feel good about using the equally insecure MicroG. Just stop pretending it is a viable choice for the majority of consumers, who don’t want to have to throw away their phones because they got infected by a swarm spam bot that also drained their bank account.




  • My country’s gov has a 2FA app to authenticate logins for public services, check digital IDs and pay taxes. No web version for that. Local banks also use that system to validate your KYC so you need to have it on your phone anyway.

    All of my banks are neobanks except my savings account, so also no web banking there. These banks have several “pots” which you can use to divide your money (bills, holidays, use later, etc) so the interactions with these apps are pretty much daily. I also don’t like to have too much money readily available so that in case of my card being cloned, the hackers won’t be able to take more than 100 euros from me.

    There are also public bikes that are free to use but require a specific app that for some reason didn’t work at all on my GrapheneOS install (I think due to Google Play Services seeing my Os is not signed by Google). I’ve also had issues in the past in a city where you could clock in and out of the metro station using an app, but I couldn’t use it because of GrapheneOSs strong anti-tracking features. Had to fork out extra money every time because paying for the metro through the machine would force me to charge at least 10€ at a time while the app would take the exact money due from my account if I used it…

    So yes, 1 inconvenience at a time is how these alternatives OSes become major PsITA to use. It’s not just the banks, it’s also the obscure local apps that are necessary to live a normal life. If you have free time to search for alternatives or don’t mind the extra work then it’s probably fine, but when you have a job and need things to just work then it becomes really jarring to use. Just my opinion.












  • No, I don’t. Samsung and other authorized OEMs run stock Google services so there’s no benefit to using them. Those devices are also substantially inferior to the Pixel in terms of security features anyways.

    The only phone I recommend is a Pixel with a properly set up GrapheneOS install, making use of profiles and private spaces depending on which apps you want to expose to Google Play Services/Framework, and which you don’t.

    Ideally your most used profile is filled exclusively with FOSS or privacy-respecting apps that can run without Google services. And I’m talking about going really deep even on elemetary things like using an offline keyboard like Heliboard or FUTO that won’t send everything you type to Google/Microsoft/Apple. Or using Gboard but with network access blocked.

    Yes, this set up takes time and some research, but it’s the only way you can guarantee your data is properly split between what is just for you to see, and what others see.

    A device that is truly yours and not someone else’s to mine for data and spy on you, possibly getting you in trouble in the future when a government demands your data from Google/Apple.

    But if you’re not willing to put in the work to set it up, then I don’t recommend any other Androids. Stay on iPhone instead.


  • Hold on, you think GrapheneOS isn’t perfectly private (and you’d be right, it isn’t, and their main focus is security anyway) but you think iPhones are better?

    Why, because Apple told you it is? Because they have some gimmicks that sound good on paper but don’t actually protect your data in any real way?

    Okay dude. Reach out to me whenever cus i got a bridge to sell you.

    Also, everything you said is incorrect, and so is your conclusion. But I don’t think we’ll ever see eye to eye on this so why bother.