
Can you give me a topic or hobby that you’d be interested in joining a forum for? It would be easier to show you with an example and I don’t want to doxx the forums I use.
Cryptagion is a misogynist who argues against consent and thinks it’s great to threaten rape and sexual harassment, lie, suppress women’s speech,&use fascism to control others and what they say instead of discourse and democracy. Coward.

Can you give me a topic or hobby that you’d be interested in joining a forum for? It would be easier to show you with an example and I don’t want to doxx the forums I use.

Lemmy just isn’t that good, you need other stuff too. I highly recommend finding independent niche website forums (the old school ones) for your interests and joining them. These are WAY less likely to have bots (unless political based) than Lemmy, Reddit, etc etc. They have real people, sometimes parroting bot stuff they saw elsewhere, but they are at least real and you can talk to them. And you get to know them because normally there’s only like 50 active users on those websites at a time anyway. But damn do those 50 people know a lot about vaccuums, or trains, or magnet fishing or whatever the dedicated topic is for that site. It’s the most unfederated you can be

It’s probably AI videos games made by AI for AI to play. People need to do stuff like mining and growing organs, they can’t do anything nice anymore like play games

This, they destroyed the art of US video games because it was promoting bad values like gay marriage in The Sims

So in that equation, let’s say mass 1 is earth. G and distance will be equal in both instances of dropping.
Rewrite equation:
Distance^2/ G*mass 1 = mass 2 /force
And
Distance^2/ G*mass 1 = mass 3 /force
Therefore,
Mass 2 /force = mass 3 /force
F = m*a
Mass 2 / mass 2*a = mass 3 / mass 3 * a
This cancels out to show that a = a, their acceleration is the same.

Interesting way to admit you were wrong

You didn’t read it, it is literally telling you you are wrong.
By experimenting with the acceleration of different materials, Galileo Galilei determined that gravitation is independent of the amount of mass being accelerated
“… in a uniform gravitational field all objects, regardless of their composition, fall with precisely the same acceleration.”
What is now called the “Einstein equivalence principle” states that the weak equivalence principle [above] holds
Tests of the weak equivalence principle are those that verify the equivalence of gravitational mass and inertial mass. An obvious test is dropping different objects and verifying that they land at the same time. Historically this was the first approach – though probably not by Galileo’s Leaning Tower of Pisa experiment[19]: 19–21 but instead earlier by Simon Stevin,[20] who dropped lead balls of different masses off the Delft churchtower and listened for the sound of them hitting a wooden plank.
Between 1589 and 1592,[1] the Italian scientist Galileo Galilei (then professor of mathematics at the University of Pisa) is said to have dropped “unequal weights of the same material” from the Leaning Tower of Pisa to demonstrate that their time of descent was independent of their mass
Newton measured the period of pendulums made with different materials as an alternative test giving the first precision measurements.[3] Loránd Eötvös’s approach in 1908 used a very sensitive torsion balance to give precision approaching 1 in a billion. Modern experiments have improved this by another factor of a million.
Experiments are still being performed at the University of Washington which have placed limits on the differential acceleration of objects towards the Earth, the Sun and towards dark matter in the Galactic Center.[45] Future satellite experiments[46] – Satellite Test of the Equivalence Principle[47] and Galileo Galilei – will test the weak equivalence principle in space, to much higher accuracy.[48]
With the first successful production of antimatter, in particular anti-hydrogen, a new approach to test the weak equivalence principle has been proposed. Experiments to compare the gravitational behavior of matter and antimatter are currently being developed.

Look like rolling pollies to me

Lol I think it’s the research you were missing and I already had the link copied. Wasn’t being a jerk for once, just was giving you info

https://www.usgs.gov/water-science-school/science/how-much-does-a-cloud-weigh
Doing the math: 1,000,000,000 x 0.5 = 500,000,000 grams of water droplets in our cloud. That is about 500,000 kilograms or 1.1 million pounds (about 551 tons). But, that “heavy” cloud is floating over your head because the air below it is even heavier— the lesser density of the cloud allows it to float on the dryer and more-dense air.
Planes, helicopters- lots heavy stuff not falling faster than lighter ones

How absurd

It isn’t a human connection.
They are mourning the loss of having a tool reflect their deepest psychological desires back at them.
Narcissists get lost in AI like it’s a true mirror of Narcissus. The Greeks were on a sick one with that story, thousands of years old and extremely relevant today.
Unfortunately, narcissism and narcissistic delusions are contagious because they are simply belief systems. It isn’t a biological or medical thing, it is a belief set. So AI really does make them worse and imo grooms people into narcissistic thinking habits.

Lol good luck, the entire thing that makes it so powerful is the collective

It usually induces terror (adrenaline/cortisol) depending on how much you do

By definition of what a norm is, no, an outlier wouldn’t be the norm. But who’s to say Willie’s physical reaction to cannabis is an outlier?
Me too, real “Thanks, I hate it”