One cold argue that “desktop” is merely a kind of a service

Daad, please stop

But he packed it in the hand luggage.

Stories. Why they are in a messenger? Especially in such a pesky way.

Do they invite Russia or laureates, who happen to be Russian?

It hardly makes them “absolute worst of rulers”.

Catherine II and Peter were ok, though.

Is your system unique, though? There’s only so much of a processor architectures. And rest of differences seem to be just a fluff to me.

Because I can customize Gentoo to whatever I like

Can you customise it to support AAA videogames?

You get to actually know what code ends up in your binaries

Do you, though? Do you check e-signatures and do you look at the every row of the code?

But are they terrible enough? I’m sure you could use some help.

So - it’s easy?

For a foreigner: shouldn’t it be “distantly related” instead?

Either way, it’s hard to have a debate with someone who is either arguing a point without understanding the other side

It’s true.

RAM is not meant to be wiped. It’s just we haven’t found a way to make it constant, but still as quick as it is now.

… and with high probability you will make it subpar to one maden by industry.

Don’t get me wrong, Linux sure is entertaining and powerful, but it demands you to be very very experienced with it to gain considerable profit over using proprietary stuff.

Well, swiss army knifes work… really bad in comparison with specialised tools.

What do you mean?

My pleasure

Exactly. There could not be true / full ownership of hardware.
And yet that’s fine for me.

Now about that:

Today you can make sure the source code is truly what you intend, by running Linux on PC and GrapheneOS on Android. You might not have the ability to audit those, but others (like me) do, and are doing so.

Even in that case you can never be sure what a compiler did with the code. You can say: go look at the code of that compiler. But then how can I be sure it’s code had been compiled without malicious modifications. And so on.