• Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    A million dollars buys a lot of food and shelter which gives you more time to do mushroom picking. And the process of accepting the prize probably wouldn’t have taken more than a couple of days

    • Badabinski@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The article says that he refused the prize because he felt that he hadn’t earned it. He felt that the prize should be awarded to Richard Hamilton who developed the theory Perelman used to fully solve the Poincaré Conjecture. I’m not saying it was the wisest or easiest solution. I was only trying to express my opinion that I find his adherence to his strong principles admirable.

      I’m absolutely not advocating for anyone to turn down a million dollars. For anyone in a position where they can just, like, get a million bucks, take that shit and live a happier life!

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      There is no taking the money and staying true to your principles here. Either you say the whole sphere of academia is corrupt and fucked, or you take a nice big cash prize and play the game. Can’t say taking money is bad and then take that money yourself

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          No, you can’t. If you believe that academia is corrupted by money to the point you walk away from it, taking their accolades and cash prizes would make you a complete hypocrite. And nobody would take you or anything you say afterwards seriously any more.

    • zerofk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      With a million dollars you can buy mushrooms, making picking them feel pointless.