Do you have links to any shadier websites, or was this the shadiest one you could find?
Oh wow it’s so shady linking to the primary sources for the study. At least put a bit of effort into your trolling kiddo.
Bro, it’s you.
I’m not the only one laughing at your low-quality posts…
I can’t wait for you to explain how these sources are low quality
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867424003982?via%3Dihub
Why didn’t you link one of those URLs, rather than whatever that epic news site is? The initial link you posted screams “this isn’t a legitimate source”.
Because those urls are right on the page together. What exactly are you even complaining about here? Evidently you judge the legitimacy of a source based on page layout? 🤷
Correct. I’m not going to waste my time reading articles on a website that has a bunch of telltale signs of having the end game of spreading disinformation.
So, a site linking to primary reputable sources has the end game of spreading disinformation. That’s a totally reasonable statement a rational person would make.
