The French government is considering a law that would require web browsers – like Mozilla’s Firefox – to block websites chosen by the government.

    • Squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      On one hand, yeah

      On the other hand, I’m scared about the day when someone who is tech literate gets into government and tries to push stuff like this

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Can’t they just put a metal box with a guard around the entire internet?

      It is just a black box with a blinking light anyway.

      Although the guard might get tired from climbing the stairs of the Elizabeth tower every day.

  • jsdz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Firefox being free software, it wouldn’t make much sense for them to try and do something like this. So obviously we know that Mozilla would never go along with such an absurd law and start doing censorship on behalf of France. … right, Mozilla? Slightly strange that you didn’t say so?

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      It would work for 95% of browser users, who will not know that they can use a fork of Firefox because they have no idea what that means.

  • moitoi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    And this how the end of a civilization or at least of an era looks like.

    The neoliberal system of deregulation of the economy and finance sector, of privatization, of weak states on these topics is crashing right in front of us. It requires now non-democratic, authoritarian, decisions to keep the head outside of the water and not shrinks undersea. The destruction of the environment is a symptom of this end.

    A small minority wanted unlimited in a limited world. They wanted to touch the stars and burned their fingers. Like arrogant teenagers, they said it’s nothing and let find solutions that are no more than placebos. But, even this now doesn’t work anymore. They have to use the authoritarian card, another placebo.

    It won’t change today. It’s a long process which can be accelerated if the population takes the lead. They know this fact. The authoritarian card is here to keep the population quite by restricting the access to the information “for the general good”. They want to control this aspect of the life too.

    But the monster they created is already out of control. It makes and always made more damage than good. They accelerated the neoliberal agenda to keep it calm but it doesn’t work. They are running after it and after their inevitable lost.

    • zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      slightly off point here but, god I hate the term ‘neoliberal’. the definition is so far from what you would think based on the word alone, it almost seems intentionally misleading. I have the same gripe with “reactionary politics”.

      idk when people will realize that capitalism is not conducive to having businesses that are respectful to their consumers and environment, no matter the amount of ill-understood, retrospective regulations you slap on.

      EDIT: honestly, I think most people have realized, but the people with the power to change it are the people gaining.

  • benpo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why forcing the browsers? Couldn’t they just make a law for ISPs to block specific domains?

  • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    How the fuck could a law like that possibly be enforceable? Mozilla should just tell them to go fuck themselves, offer alternative IPs so people can get around country-wide DNS blocks, and then go about their day. Who cares what some spineless country wants?

  • throwing_handles@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Posted to ‘privacy’ community: “Put your first and last name on this petition!”

    I expect if there are too many fake names it would be used against them too. I think not signing at all is overall less detrimental my own privacy. However if there’s evidence/reasoning otherwise please share!

    Edit: I ended up signing with my real name, I don’t see employers or anyone holding that petition against me if they find out I signed this by searching my name.

  • Lafuma300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Unfortunately, this is gonna happen and worse. We lost the fight for the internet in 2006, and we’re watching it die. No joke, I started using yandex browser and search since Google ruined theirs, and it is close to perfect. Waterfox is my backup.

    • RustyOperator@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I wouldn’t recommend using Yandex, due to it’s connections with the Russian government. You should check out privacyguides.org they have a lot of cool info about privacy respecting tools. However I also don’t recommend anything Brave. The company was founded by a homophobe who was previously in charge of Mozilla, but left, because of community pressure.

      • Lafuma300@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        What can the Russian government realistically do to me?

        My government is the one that can ruin my life.

        • Cam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Avoid all governmemt infused apps and services. Weather it is foreign or domestic.

  • Cam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If worse comes to worst, someone can fork Firefox and remove the in-browser censorship. That is the beauty of FOSS.

    • beeb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Unfortunately the 99% that don’t know about less popular options will still be affected

      • Cam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        True, however it will require some grassroots movement/discussion to make it known.

    • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Its nothing to do with the right wing and everythiny to do with authoratarianism. Left wing authoratarians hate freedom just as much. They just usually attafk different targets.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Because they see the freedom of people who aren’t like them as an abridgement of their freedom to force everyone to be like them.

    • Cam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Why do right wingers hate freedom so much?

      What? Am I on crazy pills? This has nothing to do with polticial leaning. Its man VS big gov.

        • Cam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          A globalist leaning. Macron if I recall comes from big money in the financial world. The do not have a leaning poltically, they are amoral, dark triad.