harry_balzac@lemmy.world to Chevron 7@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoMay I say that this my first post on this community?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up141arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up141arrow-down1imageMay I say that this my first post on this community?lemmy.worldharry_balzac@lemmy.world to Chevron 7@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square11linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSystemNeo@toast.ooolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoWasn’t this commenting on specifically propelling kinetic projectiles with explosives?
minus-squareLandless2029@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 years agoEven if they made some kinda super condensed handheld railgun it would’ve also worked the same. The propellant doesn’t matter. The payload does. Idk why they didn’t think of kinetic force vs energy. Since they absorbed energy. Hell they could’ve done some kinda sound based shockwave.
Wasn’t this commenting on specifically propelling kinetic projectiles with explosives?
Even if they made some kinda super condensed handheld railgun it would’ve also worked the same.
The propellant doesn’t matter. The payload does. Idk why they didn’t think of kinetic force vs energy. Since they absorbed energy.
Hell they could’ve done some kinda sound based shockwave.