It’s both a hazard for emergencies as well as a hygienic nightmare. We all see the people leaving without washing their hands!

  • Echo71Niner@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    OP you clearly have no clue what you are talking about. Safety if number one reason, slamming the open-door in people walking outside the door is another. You can defend against someone forcing their way in, by using your body weight against door, something you can not do if it swings outward. Odor control is another issue, door swing outward will release the smell into next room, rather than contain it with the swing inward. Finally, this has nothing to do with architects or interior designer, this is a building code bylaw, as accessibility demand the door swing inward for people in a wheelchair so they can operate it.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      slamming the open-door in people walking outside the door is another.

      That might be true in a small shop, but in a lot of places the bathrooms are recessed into a hallway where nobody who isn’t trying to get into or leave the bathroom should be standing.

      You can defend against someone forcing their way in, by using your body weight against door, something you can not do if it swings outward.

      Is that really a concern…? The amount of conditions that have to be true for this to become a thing seems really long… boarding on the “your insurance policy covers you if an elephant falls through the roof on the first day of February” cartoon levels of specificity.

      Not to mention if you assume a truck stop instead of a restaurant. It might be harder to use your body weight to keep a door closed, but with a proper door frame, deadbolt, and security hinges, it would be basically impossible for some hypothetical attacker to break down the door.

      Odor control is another issue, door swing outward will release the smell into next room, rather than contain it with the swing inward.

      Um, no it won’t? This is actually backwards the pivot of a door that swings back into a room, will force air out of a room with it swings out. If it swings out, when it closes it’s going to push air back towards the room.

      In either case, I’d expect basically no observable impact on the amount of perceivable smell.

      accessibility demand the door swing inward for people in a wheelchair so they can operate it.

      They still have to get out…? It’s not our handicapped folks are getting stuck in bathrooms are they? And if they are, wouldn’t that be a reason to change this?

      this is a building code bylaw,

      I’m struggling with the rational

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m struggling with the rational

        Fire codes. There’s laws about this. You can’t have doors swinging into a walkway whether it’s a bathroom door or office door.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          That surely doesn’t apply to the situations I discussed above where the bathrooms are recessed (and/or just generally wouldn’t be blocking anything if the door was open).

  • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 years ago

    Inner doors should swing inward because in case of a fire or other emergency, you don’t want to be trapped inside by something blocking the door that you cannot deal with. Even in something were preventing it from swinging open (like a rope or whatever), in theory the person could still get out because the door hinge would be located on their side and they could simply remove it.

  • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I can’t imagine being one of those people that freak out over the littlest thing. I always imagine invader Zim when he learns about germs.

  • Frater Mus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    My favorite is bathrooms where you can stand at the urinal and make eye contact with people in the dining room everytime the door opens.

  • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    You reminded me of something I learned about back when I worked at Disney - most of the bathroom doors on property swing the way you’re complaining about for reasons I can’t remember but might be because you’re supposed to have clean hands when exiting the bathroom (wash your damn hands!). But Disney’s Animal Kingdom is different, because if an animal gets loose the bathrooms are designed to keep animals out, most animals are going to have trouble figuring out how to pull open the door to get into the bathroom. Good to know in case their new batch of cheetahs also figures out how to escape.

  • karet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Thank you! Same exact thought, I was telling my friends this a while back, and they said I was making no sense

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    We need those cool and unnecessarily complicated sci-fi doors that open with multiple stages or like a camera aperture or a Stargate iris.

  • the_boxhead@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m not an expert (at all), but I presume that opening a door into a thoroughfare risks hitting someone with the door but opening into a room only risks a person ready to leave (and approaching the door head on?)

    Just thoughts…

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      One compromise might be touchless door handles

      I’ve also seen these at my school, but it doesn’t work for all doors since the door needs to be light enough

      Neither of these are that accessible though, and I can’t find photos of the better ones

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        accessibility shouldn’t prevent improvements, we can just add the foot handles and handicapped people simply keep operating doors like they currently do.

        They’ll still be exposed to fewer germs so they benefit anyways.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s fair, both options can exist at the same time in this case

      • dingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The arm one is dumb because I’ve seen people with unwashed hands grab it. The foot one makes more sense. Although it’s not accessible like you said.

        • scubbo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          The arm one is dumb because I’ve seen people with unwashed hands grab it

          So? If I can manipulate it with my sleeved arm (thus keeping my hands clean), it’s still working pretty well. Sure, I’d prefer not to have my sleeve contact something that someone’s unwashed hands have been on, but better that than my hand.

  • zerbey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Most bathrooms have foot pulls now, it’s not a perfect solution for everyone but it’s better than the alternative.