fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 9 days agoAerosolmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square130linkfedilinkarrow-up1980arrow-down111
arrow-up1969arrow-down1external-linkAerosolmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square130linkfedilink
minus-squarescratchee@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 days agoI know, the government is bad, so if we put a bad man in charge it’ll be a double negative and become good, right?
minus-squareRooskie91@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoFrom an accelerationist standpoint, yes. /s
minus-squareSpongyAneurysm@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoYou ADD a bad person to the government, you don’t MULTIPLY. But what do I know about maths?! Somehow the bad effects end up growing exponentially, and I can’t explain that.
I know, the government is bad, so if we put a bad man in charge it’ll be a double negative and become good, right?
From an accelerationist standpoint, yes. /s
You ADD a bad person to the government, you don’t MULTIPLY.
But what do I know about maths?! Somehow the bad effects end up growing exponentially, and I can’t explain that.