fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 7 days agoLmaomander.xyzimagemessage-square273linkfedilinkarrow-up1809arrow-down110
arrow-up1799arrow-down1imageLmaomander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square273linkfedilink
minus-squaresp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·7 days agoHaven’t seen it yet, I appreciate the nonspoiling =D
minus-squarewolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-27 days agoDefinitely read the book. The book is about the existential elation at discovering a solution to a dire problem, so knowing a poorly-communicated version of every solution will likely ruin the book for anyone serious about the hard Sci-Fi.
minus-squarebort@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·7 days agoiirc that detail they are refering to, didnt make it into the movie.
minus-squareWhirling_Ashandarei@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 days agoYes, correct, they skipped a lot of the harder science for the movie to keep it a reasonable length. Movie was still very good though!
minus-squarebort@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoyes. both are good in their own. It’s definitely worth to both watch the movie, and also read the book.
Haven’t seen it yet, I appreciate the nonspoiling =D
Definitely read the book. The book is about the existential elation at discovering a solution to a dire problem, so knowing a poorly-communicated version of every solution will likely ruin the book for anyone serious about the hard Sci-Fi.
iirc that detail they are refering to, didnt make it into the movie.
Yes, correct, they skipped a lot of the harder science for the movie to keep it a reasonable length. Movie was still very good though!
yes. both are good in their own. It’s definitely worth to both watch the movie, and also read the book.