Yeah kind of, but you need to have an actual machine running windows somewhere (preferably within the same network)

A VM would be more like “a window running windows”

So, a typical pupil is around 2 mm in diameter in bright conditions. With the Rayleigh limit that results in an angular resolution of 1.22 * 60010^-9 m / 210^-3 m = 3.66*10^-4 rad

At a distance of 5 x 3 mi = 15 mi = 24.1 km this corresponds to a point to point distance of

tan(a/2) = (d/2)/l

d = tan(a/2) * l * 2 = tan(3.66*10^-4) * 24100 * 2 = 8.8 m

So in conclusion, with regular, human-like eyes he could discern points that are at least 8.8 m apart in the best case scenario. Discerning hair color from the color of the clothes would need a much higher resolution, and the horsemen are probably not 10 m apart from each other either. And again, this is a theoretical limit, real-world resolution would probably be significantly lower.

even if you ignore curvature you have a resolution limit that depends on the aperture. Look up Rayleigh criterion for more info

Most organic things will get converted to biomass/CO2/NH3/… in the end. Inorganics will probably be sediment at some point.

diwkp

Get a 2 TB SSD (the one you chose is fine)

Instructions unclear, but I can now drink through a straw without opening my mouth

If you’re looking for a cheap good one, get those super cheap ones from AliExpress/etc. Imho these are soo much better than anything else you can get in the consumer space, and even some commercial ones because they are super responsive. The only downsides are that they’re relatively small so reading the display with a large bowl on top is a bit difficult and they’re probably not super accurate, especially with low loading. But that’s not really an issue for cooking. They take regular AAA batteries that last for ages and the thing costs like under 5€. I’ve had mine for like 8 yrs now and aside from a bit of liquid that got into the display it still works completely fine.

Here’s the type I’m talking about:

How else do you use your nutmeg?

How can you make sugar water taste bad? Or am I not getting something here?

Yep, the other comment is even more ChatGPT-ish. And the account was created today. Guess that’s a bot.

Take that as you will, but you sound like ChatGPT.

well, I managed to upgrade from 16.04 to 22.04 without any major issues

The thing is that many of these things just can’t be measured directly. You can use the information from the simulation to get a deeper understanding of e.g. some receptors (as was done), and use that information for something else. For example to optimize a binder for the receptor, or to manipulate the tonic signalling. But that’s then often a paper building onto the findings from the simulation.

safety razor is the way to go imo. Same benefits of a shavette but easier to use and harder to cut yourself

maybe a WhatsApp backup?

As someone in an important position once said to me, having a PhD shows that you have frustration tolerance.

You don’t. You could try overleaf or some wysiwyg editor for LaTeX, but both need some getting used to and at least a minute amount of effort. Overleaf probably has the lowest barrier of entry (0 set up required), but is a paid service.

yep, markdown is a great alternative to LaTeX if you don’t need fancy layouts or anything special

There was this company doing something similar with CDs. They sold the physical medium and then let you download the ripped files and store the CDs at their place. In fact, you could just buy the record online and directly download a .flac from their website. And if you wanted, you could have the physical medium shipped to you.

Apparently that was legal, but they have gone bankrupt a few years ago iirc. They were called Murphies (idk about the spelling).