I’m all in favor of rehabilitation instead of punitive imprisonment too, but you did say “they should be disallowed from participating in a close, intimate relationship”, not that they should be sent to rehab. We’re not twisting your words at all. There’s no other way to read that. You didn’t say anything about rehabilitation, you were talking solely about restriction of relationships. If you meant something else, you should say what you meant.
Oh so you’re the guy from the phishing training
Messaging apps often implement various APIs for better Android integration. But even if they don’t, any management service can implement certain APIs, like the accessibility API, that gives them access to everything each app is doing. In that case, it can’t necessarily read the messages as data, but it can record your screen as image or video.
If the app has decrypted messages, device management can see them.
And how do those apps prevent device management from accessing the messages when they’re decrypted?
The sending and receiving ends are the devices, not the humans. If you don’t want the device to see it, you’ll need to do the encryption and decryption in your head.
The default assumption everyone had was E2EE message data like RCS would be private.
It is. It can’t be snooped on by third parties. The person that owns and controls your device is not a third party. In this case, that is your employer.
Nothing is truly safe. Risk is relative. Assess the risk and decide for yourself.
If I don’t have a case on my Pixel it will literally slide off any surface I place it on. My desk is very nearly level, but if I put it there and look away, next thing I know it’s fallen on the floor.
Hard drives don’t normally make a clicking noise unless it’s the head resetting due to an error. I’d definitely check the health of that drive, and make sure your backups are working.
Then what do you call the body consisting of the legislature, executive, and judiciary? Because I’m pretty sure that law enforcement is accountable to someone.
make sure that the disk and boot configuration is the same (uefi, sata, secure boot)
I wouldn’t say it’s nothing, because they definitely are trying to weaken or break privacy and encryption, but it also isn’t exactly an ongoing targeted campaign.
No, just match the settings. There’s really no good way to recover if it’s broken; I’ve never been successful at fixing it and I always end up reinstalling. If the settings match you won’t have to do anything at all.
Same. Some people say that having to wait for your search to complete across all the indexers is slower, but I’m okay with that because I just set it and forget it.
Often enough that there’s a test designed to detect it specifically. If you want hard data you’ll have to find it on your own, I don’t have any handy.
Highly unlikely. These days, disk space is so cheap that all manner of drivers are provided whether you need them or not. Worst case, you should still be able to boot recovery mode or chroot, as you mentioned.
Just make sure that the disk and boot configuration is the same (uefi, sata, secure boot), else both Windows and Linux may have issues finding their boot files.
Really, then why is there an explicit SMART conveyance test?
It’s to test for damage that may have occurred during shipping.
You later clarified it, yes, but you’re getting bent out of shape when people responded to what you had initially written. We can’t see the future edits, nor read your mind for intent. We can only read what you have written.