Not sure about amazon but if you search for deezloader/deemix you’ll find ways to self-host services that download flacs from deezer. Also, there are services on most chat apps that will do it for you too if you search for the same terms.
Yeah, I just don’t want my ISP knowing what I’m doing at all.
Never heard of flaresolver, thanks for the tip!
I don’t think I have Limetorrents enabled so will add that too. Is that the priority order you have them in then? Leet, lime, eztv and then tpb?
I’m using prowlarr, I’m asking about the specific indexers within prowlarr and their order
“I’ve got nothing to hide”
The author of btop wrote bpytop first and then when it got popular, they decided to rewrite it in C++
Thank you for your insight Captain Obvious!
In Norwegian, “ja” (pronounced ya) means “yes” for positive questions, while “jo” (pronounced yoo) means “yes” in response to a negative question (contradicting a negative statement).
A fun thing about it is that it’s often pronounced on the inhale rather than the exhale.
No it’s not. Keto allows you to eat low carb plants whereas the carnivore diet eliminates all non-animal products.
Unfortunately no, audio files are actually really dumb in that they’re basically just a file of 44100 (or 48000 or 96000 etc) amplitude numbers per second.
So there’s nothing really to diff because it’s basically just a squiggly line, set of squiggly lines or, when compressed, a mathematical expression that when decompressed, recreates a squiggly line.
You could isolate the dialog if you got ahold of a version with no dialog at all and then inverse the polarity of that and sum it with the original but it’s unlikely you’ll find a version without any vocals.
Machine learning vocal isolation tools are probably going to be the best way to go about it as a DIY approach. Ultimate Vocal Remover 5 with the demucs 4 algo is great FOSS software to extract vocals and you could sum that with the original track and adjust the gain to get louder dialogue… it would be a lot of work though…
I don’t know why they don’t, I work in music rather than TV/Film but it infuriated me too! Give me a voice volume control! It would be technically very easy to do implement as a standard but the powers that be just haven’t come together and done it!
As an audio engineer, this suggestion makes my skin crawl.
Don’t apply any extra compression to your files this, it will ruin them.
Modern audio streaming services and good audio players use loudness normalization to achieve consistent playback loudness. The way they do this is by measuring the integrated loudness of each song and increasing or, in most cases, reducing the playback gain of the song to an arbitrary target (e.g. Spotify has chosen -14LUFS which is pretty quiet when you consider most pop music is mastered to somewhere between -10LUFS and -3LUFS).
OP should just find a better audio player or figure out how to enable loudness normalization.
Thanks for explaining this all! Super interesting thing that I knew existed but had no idea how it worked! Makes a lot of sense!
I third this, had mine for years, magnetic box is great, all the little plastic shimmy things are great. Solid quality.
It’s really weird reading your comment because it reads as if I wrote it.
What kind of audio stuff do you do?
Pretty sure zoxide automatically uses “z” as its alias by default. One less letter for you to type.
Copyparty looks like awesome software that I have absolutely no use for nor the time to set it up but I still want it haha. The video demonstration was really impressive if you haven’t seen it yet.
(btw It’s pique not peak)
There’s also RapidRAW, a much newer FOSS project with a much more focussed goal of actually being a simple lightweight Lightroom replacement. There are a lot of basic features still missing but it’s worth following.