Oh interesting, technicalities like? I wrote to a bunch of politicians and I was assured that they rejected it on principle.
Maybe they lied to me. But why would they lie to me but not the general public? Maybe the EU is a bunch of politicians and they all have their own opinions.
“Europe… the guys that want backdoor into all encrypted communications” is a weird thing to say considering that every attempt of such a law failed because they didn’t have the majority.
“Europe… where a minority of politicians have continually failled to get a backdoor into all encrypted communications” would be far more accurate.
It speaks to their confidence. Your lack of confidence is why you aren’t a top assassin.
The whole argumentation fails apart if you ask yourself a simple question, is the meme transformative to the art that it is using. As you already stated, “in a way the creator never foresaw” highly implies a transformative nature.
But isn’t ai art transformative? Oh it might be. But well, the company making the ai, stole art to create the model. There is no transformative step between the art piece and the version of the art piece that they use to train the ai. It is stolen art but not because the model steals, but because the model is built on stolen art. Everything that an ai model can produce is based in stolen art. So any similarities are not a little reference to some other art piece but stolen art. As the whole model is based on similarities, it produces exclusively content that has similarities to that stolen art. And if everything is a reference to stolen art, the ai art become effectively stolen art.
But what about people and their faces? Yeah i don’t think you should use/make those memes, unless the people are public figures. But not because it is stolen art, as the memes tend to be transformative, but because everyone has a right to privacy.
The problem is not the detection system or that people don’t believe it.
The problem is that people don’t seem to understand the utility of behaving like something is true while “knowing” it is not true.
E.g. let’s say, I “know” the gun is not loaded, should I point the gun at a friend and pull the trigger? No.
Verifying information before acting in a way that would put people in danger, is worth wasting time for.
So it is an ad for certifications that makes me feel sad for people who chase after them?
now I really wanna get the certificates…
I would call myself a feminist because I believe in equality. You know, fuck sexism.
Everyone! She is saying that she is jealous that her husband is content and she is trying so hard and unhappy. She isn’t shaming her husband. She is questioning herself.
Is getting downvoted hurting your feelings? 🥹 Awww. Do you need a hug?
Oh wait, I mean, get a thick skin!
You sound quite butthurt over being called a bad person. Maybe you should get a thicker skin. Have a good one.
You are just a bad person.
You can be in favor of people have a thick skin and that people shouldn’t be allowed to be assholes.
It is a bit like self-defense. It is probably for the better if people knew self-defense but that is no reason to excuse violent aggressors.
Honestly, you should be ashamed of that opinion and keep it to yourself.
He was young.
Being young, is nice. Mostly because you don’t have to deal with a lot of the issues that e.g. a house, children and maybe the marriage is not as loving as it used to be.
So he misses being young, but instead of realizing that he was just young. He thinks about what was different and as your responses imply, he blames foreigner for the change. As you expressed that he thinks of you as just a girl, he is probably also sexist and the 50s were much more sexist as it still is.
In other words, culture changed, he didn’t and he is old.
It is actually worse.
it is known that areas which got access to a formal education (schools), would get quickly much better average IQ score than before.
If just visiting school increases your IQ (some measurements suggest 14 points), then it is clearly not a fundamentale quality.
So even without specifically learning for the test, you can learn for the test.
That is not true. Bielefeld is not real.
Dear lord, I feel so bad
It doesn’t contain your phone number when read as a base 10 number! Checkmate, I got your phone number!
Sorry…
You should probably think about why that question matters for you. it is important for you to process whatever you need to. For example, it might be the case that separating your friends actions and intentions from your experience is helpful to you. It might be reasonable to say he didn’t intend to and the actions weren’t but your experience was. We experience what we believe and not “reality” and so if you believed it do be sa then you experience what you experienced. I don’t know what you actually experienced, so please don’t just take this. think about why you care and if you have the answer.
I nuked my own accounts. Fuck reddit.
If anything, your position is in opposition to nihilism.
There are different kinds of nihilism. Your position is in contradiction with the “purest” form. The absence of an objective value in anything and everything. Your position clearly values personal consent.
There are other kind of nihilism, like political nihilism, might not be in conflict with your position. On the other hand, existential nihilism, the belief that there is no inherent meaning/value in life, might seem to align with your position but I think it is difficult to argue in favor of consent, even to being alive, while believing that life is inherently meaningless. I mean, why does the consent of a meaningless being matter to anyone? Of course, you could take an adsurdism position to it but then I would argue that calling you nihilistic would be a mischaracterization.