

Eh. Discord Q is just as aware of all four walls as Pinkie Pie.
she/her, A(u?)DHD, German (linksgrünversifft), fanartist. Likes Doctor Who a normal amount. Also other nerdy BS. 🖖⚛️🦄🐙🦖🎮🗾
✨ #fckafd #fckcdu #fckmrz ✨


Eh. Discord Q is just as aware of all four walls as Pinkie Pie.


Forgetting to get groceries in time for when shops are closed for several days in a row.


The Doctor taught me that.
Theory and practice quite frequently don’t align in reality and humans are spiteful.
Yep, good thing none of us has done that.
Yeah, I read that. I still reserve the right to reject your analogy because I don’t accept it as relevant or analogue to anything. You can’t go “don’t say these things that disagree with me” and expect me to shrug my shoulders and go along.
I mean, your analogies that fall apart at the premise don’t really help.
Yeah, that’s one way to (not) answer.
You start that “analogy” with the binary assumption. That’s where it falls apart.
Yeah. So “nearby structures” determine sex, not “size of gametes”. What are they nearby? Possibly nothing.
You’d THINK capitalism would cause that to happen, wouldn’t you?
So sex is determined by what structures medical professionals expect to be there.
Cool, you’re only now even contemplating what I’ve been talking about for several posts. Ovarian agenesis, Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, anorchia.
The spherical cow does exist though, it’s in the teeny tiny slivers in the OP’s post.
So it’s not the size of gametes but some secondary structures vaguely involved in the development of structures that are involved in the production of gametes. Did I get that right?
There’s nothing about the production of gametes in there.
Let me rephrase that: people without ovaries, uterus, vagina or testes. Nowhere in their bodies. They have a vulva or a penis plus scrotum.
It’s either that or he randomly speaks in episode titles :)