100_kg_90_de_belin

The user above was asking for info, not for snark.

The right to privacy or private life is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 12), the European Convention of Human Rights (Article 8) and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights (Article 7).

Article 8 Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

Article 7 Respect for private and family life Everyone has the right to respect for his or her private and family life, home and communications.

I stand corrected

True. IMO, Google should see a drop in the usage of its services, but digital literacy is so low that talking about it is rather discouraging.

Rumor has it that sideloading will still be possible using ADB, that is the shittiest way possibile

And implemented it in the shittiest way possible

They are withholding device trees and driver binaries for Pixel phones in addition to releasing security patches when they see fit.

Embrace. Expand. Extinguish.

I started using Android in 2011, IIRC, the enshittification has hit hard.

They are rich, they don’t need to be smart

As long as the developer of the app store undergoes registration

Whatever reason is fine.

Polar bears can reach 25 mph, I don’t see myself outrunning that.

No. It’s not her fault. She’s doing the best she can, after all. It’s just that… you can’t depend on women. You can’t depend on anyone. Sooner or later, you need to learn that no one else is gonna take care of you. That’s what I learned when I had to make my own sandwich. You can’t rely on other people, BoJack.

The feature obviously has advanced safeguards and filters in place, to avoid explicit or offensive content. Unfortunately, a lot of innocuous requests also get caught in the filter, resulting in no results being generated.

Ah, yes… sanitized, algorithm friendly fun.

I had to do it more than twenty years ago and I fear that I will have to do it again soonish. It leaves a mark on your heart.

Jonathan: “That dick better be hard and ready when I get there”

In Italian we call it “sottochiappa”

They don’t… know. Trump’ supporters could actually become the living embodiment of “cutting the nose to spite the face”

If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal. (Karl Popper)

being necessary to the security of a free State

If the people with more guns think that the State is free there is no need to actually use them