• vrek@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It would be horrible in real life but I thought a funny intro to a post apocalyptic movie would be a person giving a tour of a bio lab to college interns and…

    “through our studies we have learned to increase the transmission rate and the death rate of the small pox virus. The downside is we had to mix it with rabies so the infected tend to get aggressive and lose there ability to rationalize their thoughts. Don’t worry though, there is only this one vial of it in the entire world… these gloves are quite slippery… Oops”

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      No I think it would be better in real life. To scare interns. Not actually develop the megapox.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Yeah it’s not that simple, wikipedia has a good summary:

    Advocates of final destruction maintain that there is no longer any valid rationale for retaining the samples, which pose the hazard of escaping the laboratories, while opponents of destruction maintain that the samples may still be of value to scientific research, especially since variants of the smallpox virus may still exist in the natural world and thus present the possibility of the disease re-emerging in the future or being used as a bio-weapon.

    • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Exactly, know your enemy, especially if you think you have defeated it.

      We are about to see all the “defeated” diseases make a comeback due to politicians interfering in preventative healthcare. All in order to drive up revenue for big pharma and corporate healthcare from the increase in sick people.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          How big is its genome? There isn’t much in a virus.

          People can replicate a lot of them from purely data.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            How many distinct genomes are there that we include under the label “smallpox”? It’s also a great deal more complicated than simply storing the genome - much as gene expression in humans is more complicated than simply “this is what the DNA says”, it’s also more complicated than that for viruses. We’re finally to the point that we can simulate interactions, but it’s -absolutely- not a trivial thing to do (supercomputer shit) and simply saving the source material prevents any risk of loss of information.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Soulless Artificial Intelligences irritated with humanity constantly trying to get them to answer dumb questions can replicate a lot of them from purely data.

            FTFY

            • marcos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It’s actually very real machines, doing extremely well controlled chemical reactions, and no AI unless you count all computer software as AI (ok, processors have neural networks controlling them nowadays, so just “normal” amount of AI).

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    This would kind of make sense if Isildur had taken the ring and tried to disassemble it and learn how its various magic effects worked, in order to extend life without the downsides.

    The amount of things we’ve learned from the field of virology is fucking nuts.

          • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            21 hours ago

            The name, the instance, and the commenting behavior all sort of add up to something odd. Then you take the specifics of each comment and how they just seem… bland and vague enough they could have been in reply to anything.

            Just, for instance, look at the two comments made in this post.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Their comments never contribute anything to the posts, either. Very weird, most bots I see these days are a lot more convincing than this. Curious what’s going on here. Maybe it’s just performance art.

              • witty_username@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                20 hours ago

                The author(s) may just be learning what the reactions are to the comments. Here for instance, the comment elicited downvotes. This may be used to teach a model to avoid the style of the comment